Last updated: 31 August 2002
This page is for user comments and information specific to the Meade ETX-90RA (originally known as the "ETX Astro") and the ETX-90EC. Comments on accessories and feedback items appropriate to other ETX and DS models are posted on other pages. If you have any comments, suggestions, questions or answers to questions posed here, e-mail them to me and I'll post them. Please use an appropriate Subject Line on your message. Thanks.

Subject:	ETX90 Declination motor problem and solution
Sent:	Saturday, August 31, 2002 16:29:45
From: (Dale Gaudier)
Great site. I've gleaned a lot of good info on the ETX90 over the past
few years.

I thought I'd share my experience with a recent problem with the dec
motor of my scope, and the cure. I haven't seen this particular problem
reported before.

The symptoms: my ETX90 developed frequent "motor failures" (as reported
on the Autostar) with the unit failing to initialize. It would also
sometimes have a runaway dec motor. Shutting down and restarting worked
sometimes, but usually only for a short period, then the dec motor would
fail or go into runaway mode.

I opened up the fork arm with the dec motor using the instructions on
the Scopetronix site (thanks Scopetronix!). I took the dec motor unit
and electronics board out. Immediately saw that the original Meade
grease had gotten onto the phototransistor next to the optical encoder
wheel - not good. So cleaned off the glop, along with a lot of other
excess grease in the drive train. Cleaned everything up, added a bit of
clean lithium grease, then reassembled everything.

I did a reset, calibrate motors, then an Easy Align just to check
everything out. Everything worked fine for about 10 minutes until I
tried to move the scope in declination and nothing happened. Power off,
power on, and got a motor unit failure.

Disassembled the dec motor unit again. This time I used the regular
(non-Autostar) hand controller just to be sure it wasn't an Autostar
problem. I tried running the dec motor while it was out of the fork arm.
It would run OK when horizontal (PC board parallel to the base of the
ETX) but it would stop when I rotated the drive/PC board vertically, as
it would normally be in the ETX fork arm. Hmmm.

This implied a loose connection, so I got out my trusty soldering iron
and resoldered all the wire connections to/from the PC board and dec
motor. Ran the dec motor again with the same results - OK when
horizontal, dead when vertical. Hmmm. Must be a loose component.

I look at all the components. All the surface mount chips look OK. I try
wiggling the other components one by one. Aha! the quartz crystal (used
for timing) is loose! Further inspection under a magnifying glass shows
two "cold" solder joints where the crystal is mounted to the PC board.
Looks like the solder was making only occasional contact with the
conductors on the PC board - this explains the positional sensitivity of
the dec drive unit. The cold joints may have slowly worked their way
loose in the two years I've had the scope - this could have been caused
by thermal cycling from the scope being moved outdoors for viewing then
back inside my house.

I soldered the two leads of the crystal, then reassembled everything.
Powered up and bingo! - everything works. I've been running the scope
each evening now for a week and there have been no more failures.

I hope my experience will help someone else out there who might
experience a similar problem.

Clear skies,


Subject:	Mount suitability
Sent:	Friday, August 30, 2002 13:06:40
From: (Brian MacDonald)
Great site.
Do you know if it is possible to mount an older ETX "M" tube in the
mount of a ETX 60?  It would allow the use of the Autostar drive with
the larger aperature of the 90.
Thanks for you time.
Brian MacDonald
Mike here: Don't think this will work without a lot of modifications.

Subject:	Eyepieces and Deep Sky Objects
Sent:	Monday, August 26, 2002 07:21:19
From: (Louai Al Falahi)
i have now an 26mm eyepiec + 9.7mm + 2Xbarlow lens and the etx90 ec, so
can i see the deep sky objects whith my etx90 and the eyepieces?

Mike here: Yes and No. You'll be able to see some (assuming dark skies) but not others (beyond the limits of your eye plus the ETX-90). Some will be faint fuzzy blobs and not magnify well. Generally speaking, use the lowest magnification to locate the object and then try increasing it; at some point it will probably become invisible to your eye.

Subject:	etx90ra 
Sent:	Sunday, August 25, 2002 21:50:59
just wanted to let everyone know that woodland hills camera is selling
brand new etx 90ras for 189.00 that includes shipping. they still have
some ones left that come with the series 4000 26 eyepiece. this is a
great buy.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 27, 2002 20:35:06
the deal just got better they now are selling the etx90ra for $179.00
and that includes shipping what a deal.

Subject:	wow! great site
Sent:	Saturday, August 17, 2002 1:10:10
From: (Alexander Duerloo)
i enjoyed to visit your site. I hope you know sky and telescope magazine
wrote an article about your site. so thats how I discovered your site. I
own an ETX-90RA and which one do you own. dont have much expierience
with the etx because I own my scope for a month i bought if in mid july
and I'm happy I have it now.but thanks to your site it will be lots
easier to use my ETX.

I have a question for you, my worm wheels are not really correctly set
so do you know a trick to re-adjust them correctly?

Alexander Duerloo
Mike here: I get Sky and Telescope (have for 40 years!) so I know about the writeup. I currently have the original ETX (now known as the ETX-90RA), an ETX-125EC, and an ETX-70AT. I also still have my 1960s Edmund Scientific 3" reflector (my first telescope). The ETX-90RA is my most used telescope, with the ETX-125EC coming in 2nd. As to worm gears, can you be a little more explicit? There are several articles on the Telescope Tech Tips page that might be applicable.
Subject:	A Couple of '90 RA' Questions
Sent:	Thursday, August 15, 2002 7:18:43
From: (Dioni Miranda)
Just a couple of questions:

1) Does the ETX-90 RA have hard stops, or do I need to keep track of
'turns' in order not to damage any wiring inside the base?

2) I just got a Celestron red dot pointer for the 90 RA. If I mount it
on the plastic towards the back of the OTA (on the RIGHT side of the
eyepiece), it gets in the way of: a) handling (comfortably) the screw
that secures the eyepiece, b) the declination lock (as the OTA moves up
and down), and c) adjusting the hand screw that lies under the red dot
find (toward the back) because of all the crowding around it in general.
Two questions: I'd like to move the red dot finder to the blue aluminum
further to the front, will double-sided foam tape damage the finish on
the aluminum if I ever were to take it off? and, How did YOU solve that

Thanks again for the help,
Mike here: 1. No and no. 2. I didn't solve that problem. I had the Scopetronix LightSight mounted in the same position you indicate and had the same problems. Like you I didn't want to run the risk of damaging the tube color! If I had been more careful I would have positioned it slightly differently. An alternative to tape is to use plastic wire bundle straps.


So about the lack of hardstops on the 90 RA, I guess you just keep from
turning the scope in R.A. over 180 deg in one direction from home
position, right? and: I just used the ETX-90 RA last night for the first
time, and was able to get an excellent polar alignment with the help of
Dr. Clay's 'Kochab Clock' method and a little luck. I could tell it was
good because there was no drift in declination when tracking objects.
However, in right ascension, it tracks TOO FAST! With a 26mm eyepiece,
objects remained pretty well centered for almost 8 minutes before the RA
drift took them off center to the right in the field of view. At 20
minutes of tracking it was right on the edge of the FOV, and at 25
minutes, gone! Are my expectations too high? I mean is that 'just the
way it is' with the ETX-90 RA? Can any adjustments be made to slightly
lower the 'sidereal' tracking rate? I checked it on objects at 45 deg
dec, and at the celestial equator with similar results. Again, thanks
for any comments! Dioni
Mike here: There is no "home" position on the RA model; that is used to describe a specific position when using an Autostar. So, no hardstops do not present a problem. As to tracking speed, I don't recall there being an adjustment on the circuit board of the ETX-90RA. However, there are mods you can make (see the Telescope Tech Tips page).
Subject:	etx question
Sent:	Wednesday, August 14, 2002 16:36:19
From: (Tom Lakovic)
i have an etx question and who better to ask (i thought) than a mega fan
of the etx such as yourself...sooo......

if i get an etx-90 without the autostar controller, just the standard
hand controller i guess, then can I use my palm's "planetarium"
(excellent) software to control the etx instead of the meade autostar
controller? i mean a computer is a computer right and the ra/dec motors
should respond to anything telling it to move and requesting feedback on
where it is, whether it's a standard hand controller, autostar, pc or
palm? yes?

hope so. i'd like to do photography with good do you think an
etx-90 is at photography?

Mike here: The "brains" of the ETX GOTO system are in the Autostar. So, to control the ETX you need an Autostar AND the proper serial cable to connect from your computer. As to astrophotography, there are many excellent examples and tips on my ETX Site.
Subject:	ETX-90 RA OK?
Sent:	Thursday, August 8, 2002 11:25:48
From: (Dioni Miranda)
Thanks again for your time. I own an ETX-125 w/ UHTC and I'm tempted to
buy the ETX-90 RA tomorrow ('for the road') from Astronomics (which has
'new' ones on sale for $250)

2 quick questions:

1. I've read a lot on your website about problems the ETXs used to have
but where later corrected by Meade. Is it likely that a 'new' (meaning
'just out of the box') RA might have the same 'problems'. In other
words, did those 'corrections' apply to the RAs, or just the ECs?

2. I was told that the RA tracks objects, but has to be moved manually
by unlocking and locking the two axes everytime you want to see a new
object. In your experience (or from what you've heard): Does the
constant tightening and loosening of the two axes wear out or have any
negative effect on the scope's axes, RA clamps or DEC knobs?

Thanks again,
Mike here: The mechanicals on the ETX-90RA are sufficiently different from the EC model that I doubt any improvements are transferable. Many telescopes require locking and unlocking the axes. With proper care to not overtighten them, they should last many years.

Feedback Archives

Check the Feedback Archives for previous editions of the ETX-90RA and ETX-90EC User Feedback pages.

Return to the top of this page.

Go to the ETX Home Page.

Copyright © 2002 Michael L. Weasner /
Submittals Copyright © 2002 by the Submitter