[Home!]

ETX USER FEEDBACK - OCTOBER 1997
Last updated: 31 October 1997

Many ETX users have written to me with comments or questions. If you have any comments, suggestions, or answers to questions posed here, please e-mail them to me and I'll post them.

See the ETX Feedback Page for current comments.


Sent:	Friday, October 31, 1997 17:16:37
From:	wizard@moose.ncia.net (Neal McIlvaine)
Do you know if anyone is using or is it possible to use an
EpsonPhotoPC500 Digital Camera with the ETX.
Thanks,
Neal
wizard@ncia.net


Sent:	Thursday, October 30, 1997 16:37:06
From:	rhappold@inreach.com (Rick S Happoldt)
Would the ETX give better images of Jupiter and Saturn than, say,
a Celestron 80EQ or 6" Meade Dobsonian?


Sent:	Thursday, October 30, 1997 12:15:01
From:	LTHUEDK@aol.com
All ETX owners readily acknowledge their instruments' strengths
and shortcomings, and after all is said, we lovingly embrace our
special toy like an appendage connected to our bodies.  The
little scope gives pleasure and excitement to lives grown bored
with well-trodden interests.
It has for me, reawakened the sense of wonder about things
distant and unfamiliar, and ended a four decade absence  by
connecting me to everything else-always out there-but so casually
ignored. The little glass, metal and plastic scope has brought me
back to a place I frequented as a child and dearly miss as an
adult.
_____________________________________________________________________

I took the advice of a fellow who suggested purchasing a Black
and Decker Workmate for a stable and transportable viewing table,
then made some small modifications to secure the ETX.  I do
believe the small tripod legs are the epitome of engineering
elegance, and give the most stable support available, but only if
their support surface is stable.  So,  I inletted into the
tables' surface, three elliptically shaped cutouts of equal depth
to accept the tripod legs.  Through the center latitude leg
cutout a 1/4" hole was drilled.  Corresponding to that hole, I
epoxy'd a 1/4" X 20 nut within the leg, flush to the surface. 
Now, when set up, the scope nestles firmly into the leg sockets,
with the center leg secured by bolt.  This arrangement is quite
solid.

Additionally, I inletted a compass and bi-directional carpenters
bubble into the table surface, which facilitates rapid polar
alignment.

The space between the "jaws" of the B and D workmate provide an
area for installing a plastic tray (via velcro) to hold viewing
goodies.
____________________________________________________________________

I enjoy visiting this site, Mike.  Clear skies to you.


Sent:	Tuesday, October 28, 1997 16:57:58
From:	hmacosta@adinet.com.uy (Hector Acosta)
My name is Hector Mario Acosta, I'm from Uruguay (SouthAmerica,
between Brazil and Argentina), I'm a student and I'm member of
our local astronomy club called 'Asociacn de Aficionados a la
Astronoma'. I'm very interested in buying an ETX, but here in my
country the local dealer its a little bit crazy because he's
selling the ETX at a prize of U$S 900 !!!!. I would like to know
how can I buy one in the USA and bring it to my country. Is a
private courrier like DHL safe enough to send one ETX and some
accesories?
I will be very pleased to recivce your reply, my e-mail address
is hmacosta@adinet.com.uy. Thank you very much.. And
congratilations your page is EXELENT I printed it all!!!!!!!!

Hector Mario Acosta

Mike here: Check out the Sky&Telescope web page; they have a page of dealers. You could then start making phone calls. Some dealers also have web pages. You could also send an email to tnc@aol.com and see what they say. Good luck.


Sent:	Monday, October 27, 1997 19:27:08
From:	jrs01@gnofn.org (John)
I am considering getting the Orion SkyView equatorial mount and
tripod for my ETX and 4.25"f4 Newtonian scopes.  I was wondering
if anyone else has used this mout for their ETX and how it
functions for them?  If so, how is the RA DC motor drive for the
mount?  Although the ETX fork mount DOES work, I find the scope
hard to "point" with anything that's more than 35 degrees or so
from the equator.
I would appreciate any response.  I do like the scope, I am
beginning to feel a better mount might help.

Thanks,

John
jrs01@gnofn.org


Sent:	Monday, October 27, 1997 04:57:14
From:	Zeta1@aol.com
Thanks again for your web page, it is a wealth of information for
any ETX or prospective ETX owner.
I'm getting closer  "making the plunge". Getting info from all
over here is what i have arrived at...... to purchase:

ETX
# 932 45 degree Image Erecting Prism
12.4 mm Meade Series 4000 Super Wide Angle 
4.7 mm Meade Series 4000 Ultra Wide Angle ( 266x sounds good to
me, but might as well really forget the barlow as 532x is not
even remotely possible <grin>)
and
is part # 07035 the long leg for 26 degrees latitude, i need that
also.

No barlow (too much loss of light)
No Motofocus (only really needed if photography is involved)
No Motodec (only really needed if photography is involved)

Being somewhat of a newbie (going from flea market scopes to
something good) i like the idea of Motodec and Motofocus as i
keep bumping my 4 1/2" dob, but don't want to throw my money away
(watcha think?). I'm going to build a wedge and save $125, but
i'm still looking for a tripod, any suggestions.

I usually research something well enough that i have only a few
questions after i buy it, but being relatively new, i would like
to see and check out a ETX before i buy one. I have ran some ads,
and was hoping to find someone nearby ( 0 to 3 hours away) so i
could look before i leap <grin>.

I looked at all the astromart ads in the last 2 or 3 months that
mentioned ETX and the savings was from about $64 to $300 on a
used ETX with extra goodies. To me, might as well buy a new one
with the 2 year and 10 year warranty (don't know if is
transferable or not) if i'm going to save $100 or less. Then the
ones with more extra goodies, weren't necessarily the goodies
that i wanted, ( bigger savings though)  then again being a
newbie, possibly later on i would want those items.... at this
point i don't understand all i know about astronomy and the ETX.

So who is your favorite Astronomy Store (and why) and do they all
stick to Meade's suggested discount retail price or to some of
them knock off some extra $$$ when you place the order. (( I
found some computer goodie suppliers that usually will knock off
a little more, even over the already low catalog price)) Yes, i
know stores must make a reasonable profit to stay in business,
but then again. If your out go exceeds your income then your up
keep is your down fall.

Please Mike and everyone one else, please give me some e-mail
feedback comments on my questions. It is my understanding that
the Meade Company (at least the ETX part) has moved and many
dealers are waiting on shipments, so i have s week or two to wait
if i go "new". Years ago i worked for a large company with some
pretty smart people. It was real easy to get a consensus of
opinion on almost any subject. With more information you can make
better decisions. ETX and prospective ETX owners have to be the
smartest people with the most knowledge on the ETX.....

Possibly, we could all get together and figure out the best
combination of usefull extra "goodies" and call it the "Weasner
Package", simply because anyone with a ETX and Computer who is
online should be reading and getting info from:

http://www.weasner.com/etx/index.html

the best ETX url.

Thanks,
Z
(Tim)


Sent:	Sunday, October 26, 1997 03:14:40
From:	anspeca@pdq.net (Anthony N. Speca)
I enjoyed reading Carlos Leal's posting (Oct 14, 1997 07:52:59)
about modifying a C5 mount for use of the ETX.  I wonder if other
readers have been successful in adapting this or other mounts for
upgrading ETX tracking.  Perhaps they can add a posting or
contact me privately.
BTW the site is one of my favorites.  Thank you for taking the
time needed to keep it going.

Tony
anspeca@pdq.net


Sent:	Friday, October 24, 1997 16:38:16
From:	MORRISR@RJRT.com (Morrison, Bob A.)
Thanks again for the great job you are doing with the ETX site.
We got our ETX from the Nature Co. and found everything to be in
order, i.e.  - working properly.
Per several suggestions, we got the #126 Barlow and the 9.7mm
Super Plossl.  All excellent quality.

Also sent to B&H Photo for the Doskocil Seal-Tight Case,
extra-large( it comes gray or black for about $75 including
shipping).  It inspires confidence that nothing will damage the
ETX inside.  I put the ETX at the top (nearest the handle) and
made smaller niches for the legs, eyepieces, etc. below it,
nearer the hinge.  The case is a bit large and heavy, but not so
bad that I would not want to take it traveling. On Oct. 22, I
made my first observation of Saturn, rings and one moon (I
think).  For a real beginner, there is nothing quite like seeing
the real thing, instead of a picture.  Jupiter and the four
Gallilean moons, Venus, Mars and the moon are all great thrills. 
Even with an approximate polar alignment by just eyeballing the
scope on the table which is aligned N-S, Saturn, Jupiter or Venus
stayed in view with the 9.7mm for at least 10 minutes.  The view
does not seem to improve much at all when changing from 26mm to
Barlow or to 9.7mm.  The higher the magnification the harder it
was to focus.  Finding the exact focus is very difficult; I tend
to overshoot with the focus knob having just a little play before
engaging. The JMI Moto-Focus might be the answer here.

When trying the focus test with a star in view, both directions
from the in-focus point result in identical rings.  The images
are crisp and clear.  It looks like a winner.

Have you identified Neptune or Uranus in your ETX yet?  I don't
have the skills yet, but wondered, since they are supposed to be
just West of Jupiter.

I encourage everyone to contribute their findings and suggestions
to your site.  It sure helps us all.

Thanks again,
Rob Morrison
also at:   ramorr1@ibm.net

Mike here: I did see Uranus last year but have been unsuccessful this year for some reason. Still trying. Since I haven't been able to see Uranus I haven't yet tried for Neptune.


Sent:	Friday, October 24, 1997 13:13:30
From:	gilt@well.com (Gil Torbeck)
I like your ETX page very much although I do not (yet?) have an
ETX. I'm sure it is very useful as a clearinghouse of information
on this telescope.
Perhaps you can tell me something.  I have heard that Astronomy
Magazine published a review of the ETX not too long ago.  Would
you know in what issue that was ?

Thanks in advance.

Gil Torbeck
gilt@well.com


Sent:	Friday, October 24, 1997 08:52:53
From:	elrond@miracle.net (elrond)
is it possible to get a focal reducer for the ETX?


Sent:	Thursday, October 23, 1997 14:24:59
From:	NebM42@aol.com
I finally got the chance to try out both the Meade etx astro, and
the old version Meade 2045. The first test was on deep sky
objects. In the ETX M57 was clearly visible at 16.7mm. Then off
to the Meade 2045. M57 was allso clearly visible, but much
brighter this time. I could even see the circle in the middle of
M57. Looked more like a ring this time. The etx showed M57 but it
look more like a round Blur.
Off to Planets! I observed Saturn first with the Meade Etx. I was
using a 12.5mm eyepiece with a 2x barlow lens on Saturn. Seeing
was nice, i could pick out the hole ring structure and even the
Cassini Division if you looked close. Then off to the Meade 2045.
I used the same eyepieces as i did with the ETX on Saturn. When I
compaired the Images ,the 4" Meade 2045 it  had a little bite
more contrast than the ETX. I picked out 2 of it's moons and even
a Brownish Cloudband on the Top of Saturn. Using a filter,
brought out even more detail. I used a #12 yellow filter. I
picked the Cassini Division No problem, not like siting there and
waiting for it to pop in with the etx. I allso noticed the Dark
Spacing of the rings near the inner part of  Saturn. They looked
more like ears.

The next planet was Jupiter. Using the 12.5mm and the 2x Barlow
the Meade 2045 and the ETX gave off somenice views . They both
showed the 2 maincloud bands all 4 moons. I would say that this
time it was a draw. The Meade 2045 might of had a small bite more
contrast but this would of been noticed more with a trained eye.

Both scope were Ultra Portable. This is great if you have a small
car and don't have room for a big scope and allso If you go on
Buisness trips you can bring it right allong. I find that my 4"
SCT is great because I don't have to drive 30 miles to my Dark
observing spot I could just walk with it in my backpack to a
school FootBall Field, witch was inpossible to enter with my 8"
Dob.

After examining both scopes , I would have to say that the Meade
2045 was better. But since they don't preduce them any more, you
could buy one used for about 500-600 in good condition. The ETX
is allso a great scope. This scope is an alternative to buying
the Meade 2045. But if your looking into Observing Planets with
great detail along with Deep sky objects buy a 6"-10" Dob.

I have some questions about the meade 2045 if anyone has one out
there. Is it possible to use a f/6.3 Focal Reducer on the scope?
If it is possible then the meade 2045 Will out preform the ETX by
ALLOT!. It will give the scope a wider filed of view.Allso is it
possible to use a 2" Diaginal on the 2045?  E-mail me at
NebM42@juno.com for some questions or coments.

Clear skies!

Adrian Lozinski
Amateur Astronomer from Long Island


Sent:	Thursday, October 23, 1997 10:55:02
From:	LMArnold@aol.com
Great web page!!  The finest I've found on ALL telescopes!!  I am
thinking about buying myself an ETX for ET-Xmas.  It seems that
you're genuinely pleased with yours.  Can you please answer some
questions?
1.  What's the longest exposure time you've ever taken? (I'm
familiar with the "heavy camera/slow motor" problem)

2.  Would you consider the ETX "tripod ready"??  I've got a great
photographic tripod I'd like to use to take along with me since I
live near a big city.

--Larry Arnold

Mike here: As you can see from the tracking tests on the ETX Gallery page and the Deep Sky astrophotography page, exposures longer than 30-60 seconds will trail due the torque problem. The tripod has to be a sturdy one, especially when the pan head is tilted for your latitude. Afterall, you don't want the ETX/tripod to fall over! And thanks for the praise. These pages are a combined effort of myself and many other ETX users.


Sent:	Thursday, October 23, 1997 10:32:44
From:	barryc@bluewatervisual.com (Barry A. Craig)
I recently won a Meade ETX at our local Star Party (Island Lake
Star Party near Brighton, Michigan). It was supplied by the
Nature Company. Imagine my surprise! I wouldn't have bought one
on my own new, for I have many bigger scopes. The optics are
GREAT! It's small size with a built-in drive makes it hard to
miss a clear night. I hate the finder and immediately started to
look for a solution. I bought a Quick Finder from Rigel System
http://pw2.netcom/~rigelsys/Rigelsys.html.  It works great and
didn't cost very much.
Barry C.

Mike here: There is a short review of the QuikFinder on the ETX Accessories - Finders page.


Sent:	Thursday, October 23, 1997 08:56:17
Currently  i have a 60 mm refractor and a 4 1/2" reflector dob,
both are little more than toys, possibly a little less <grin>, i
look at the moon but everything else unless i use low power is
fuzzy....
I looked at a 8" Celestron Star Hopper with homemade motor drive
and regular dob base, but it was just too big.

So now i told my buddy who has the Meade 12.5" Dob that i had
looked at a Starhopper and he said "Have i got a deal for you'",
so even if i don't end up with the 12.5" and even if i do. I'm
still interested in a small motor drive scope. LIke the Questar
(which i will need save for <grin>) or the ETX.

I have noticed by using my flea market scopes that while i can
see the moon or planets on low power that high power on planets
makes them look fuzzy. I guess they call that the ability to
resolve (i'm a newbie, remember). I was thrilled to look at
Saturn at 320x on the Starhopper and am hoping to find something
(with motor drive (( saturn quickly went out of the ep <grin>))
that will present a image of that size in the ep. I have searched
and looked over the web in the newsgroups and web sites (yours is
the best ETX sight i might add). I have printed out about 2" of
telescope information.

I have seen several maximum powers mentionied for the ETX (90mm x
2 = 180x, is that the max?) Actually what is the maximum power 
that the ETX can reslove ( i guess that means not fuzzy) a star
or planet. Does it make much of a difference if you use a barlow?
Or what is the smallest ep i can use (1250mm/5mm = 250) or with a
2x then (1250 / 2.5 = 500 ?) I have read part of your feedback
and printed out part also, and will go back and read it all, but
if you have the time please let me know what max power is and if
i can expect Saturn to look as good and be as big as it was in
the 8" Starhopper that i am not going to get. I realize their
will be differences as they are two different sizes and types of
scopes, but this will help me understand if i am heading in the
right direction this time.....

Sincerely,
Thanks,
Z
(Tim)

Mike here: Thanks for the comment. As to magnification, yes, there is a limit which is normally stated as "50-60x times the objective diameter in inches". So, the ETX is 3.5" which gives 175-210. Obviously an 8" or 12" will give much higher numbers. But that is not the whole story. Quality of all the optics, number of optical surfaces, the quality of the seeing (how turbulent the air is), and how temperature stabilized your scope is, that is, how bad the air currents within the scope are as it changes from room temperature (assuming it was inside) to the night time observing temperature. Optically, the ETX is a superior scope but adding a Barlow lens will add more surfaces and so degrade the image somewhat. If you purchase one of the really high quality eyepieces (that can cost almost as much as the ETX itself) then you can stretch that theoretical limit. On a good night, with normal eyepieces, and a temperature stabilized ETX, you can also stretch that limit. So it comes down to what you want to trade off for what. Portability for magnification, ease of set-up for no drive, etc. Only you can make that decision. Hopefully there is enough information on the ETX pages to help; there is certainly a lot of information thanks to the support of many ETX users worldwide.


Sent:	Wednesday, October 22, 1997 21:47:18
From:	lo-fi@mindspring.com (Jonathan Maier)
I recently acquired a used 8x50mm Meade finder scope and compared
to the standard finder, it's a dream come true, however I have no
good way of mounting it to the ETX. Once I removed the ETX's
standard finder, I tried several schemes of velcro and
double-stick tape to attach the 50mm finder, but none were sturdy
enough. So eventually I just had to strap it on with duct tape
and insert a small piece of stryofoam underneath the end to align
it properly. As you might imagine, it looks really ugly, but it
works great! Anyway, I was wondering if you knew of anything like
a dovetail mount or accessory rings that were available for the
ETX; that would really make things more elegant. Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Maier                                lo-fi@mindspring.com


Sent:	Wednesday, October 22, 1997 02:50:47
From:	man_ldn@prodigy.net (Michael & Lori Nicholas)
Have been an ETX user for about four months now.  I have returned
to interest in astronomy from my adolescent years.  Observed the
Aldeberan occultation on the morning of 10/19.  It was
spectacular and I was able to get some good timing data (I think
!!!).  I have also had good success on many deep sky objects.  I
continue to be amazed by the optical performance of the
instrument.
I have a question regarding a dew cap for the 8x20mm finder.  Has
anyone tried constructing one?  My flexible dew cap from Orion
Telescopes works very well but the finder gets dewed over rather
too easily.  Does anyone have any ideas?

Mike Nicholas
Paducah, Kentucky


Sent:	Tuesday, October 21, 1997 22:26:36
From:	rubis@ameritech.net (Randy Rubis)
I just dropped by your excellent web site to mention that I have
found a great thing to do with your ETX during the daylight
hours.  I recently purchased a solar filter (full aperture) for
the ETX and I have had a wonderful time viewing the Sun.  The Sun
is very dynamic and it's very interesting to view the progress of
sunspots from day to day.  I would highly recommend ETX owners to
invest in a full aperture (the only safe way to view the Sun) and
enjoy daylight observations.  I paid under $60.00US for the glass
solar filter.  Remember, when viewing the Sun you MUST be careful
and cover your finder.  Only attempt to view the Sun with a FULL
APERTURE filter.  Good Luck and Clear Skies
Point your browser to:

www.look-inc.com/rrubis/etx3.jpg
If you would like to see the ETX with a solar filter.

Drop by web site if you would like to see actual solar images
using the Orion Solar Filter.

Randy-Michigan
 
-- 
Randy Rubis
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, USA

"We Who Dare....Win!"
Home Page http://www.look-inc.com/rrubis/randy1.htm


Sent:	Tuesday, October 21, 1997 17:56:40
From:	techdivereric@worldnet.att.net (Eric Philipp)
I bought my ETX, last week. And already I have been having alot
of fun with it. I have gotten some very beautiful views of
Jupiter. Crystal clear, the thing is amazing.. Venus has also
been a target.. M45 also has been an everynight object.. I am
having trouble finding Saturn.. Where do I look... I live in
Minnesota.. Jupiter is due south, but I can't find Saturn.. I am
still a beginner but I am reading alot.. But sometimes I can't
follow those books, they are alittle heavy for me..
Can you help with my quest to find Saturn...

Thanks much...

Eric

Internet E-mail: techdivereric@worldnet.att.net

Mike here: Glad you like the ETX for viewing heavenly objects! As to where to find Saturn, you should check out some astronomy software such as Voyager II (commercial) and SkyChart 2000 (shareware). Both have links from my Other Astronomy Links Page. But right now you'll find it low in the East shortly after it gets dark. It will be approximately due south about midnight.


Sent:	Tuesday, October 21, 1997 13:48:30
From:	mmcgarve@fvcc.cc.mt.us (Michael McGarvey)
After getting chased in by the dew a couple times I got the dew
cap suggested in the guest feedback section.  With the flat black
paint and velcro it looks great and works wonderfully.  Those
considering this should get the 4" styrene drain connector (not
schedule 40 PVC) which is quite light and just the right size.
Despite my collimation problem I've been having lots of fun.  The
nebulosity in the Pleades is really startling.  Looking in the
center of the field of the 26mm eyepiece I thought my dewshield
was failing me. When I looked directly at Merope and the bluish
haze disappeared it dawned on me that I was seeing the reflection
nebulosity with averted vision.

Clear skies,

Mike McGarvey


Sent:	Monday, October 20, 1997 15:51:04
From:	filmdos@seanet.com (Paul S. Walsh)
Herein my promised report on our trip to the Pyrenees with the
ETX... The good news is that the scope travelled beautifully in
the JMI hardcase.  The case fit well on the overhead shelf or
trunk cavity of every subway, 777, TGV, taxi cab and commuter
train we piled into from Huntingdon, England to St. John de Luz
on the Cote Basque. The bad news is that the Pyrenees look
beautiful in the snow and gale force winds we encountered but the
"etoiles" we're only visible on one night - that was, however,
enough to give our French hosts a dazzling view of cassini's
division (4.8mm Nagler) and Jupiter's 4 dancing showgirls (18mm
Celestron Ultima).  It was a gift very well received and the set
up time was a lightning 2 minutes flat from a locked case to
"Bien Venue de Saturn!" (please pardon my French - our host's
eldest son said I spoke it with a Russian Accent!  Go figure.  In
all respects except meteorologically this was a dream vacation
for us. For it's part, the ETX performed like the most talented
of bit players - always prepared, quick to improvise, and
brilliant in it's all too brief moment on stage.  The Ian Holm of
travel scopes.
Nice new additions to your page, by the way - still the the best
ETX resource anywhere. All the best - Paul and Valarie.


Sent:	Monday, October 20, 1997 10:47:42
From:	Lorne@rand.org (Lorne Teitelbaum)
Hello, I have a question about the ETX.  Under specifications,
you list that the maximum practical visual power is 325X.  Is
this the same as maximum practical magnification?  I am only a
beginner at amateur astronomy but I thought that the limit on
magnification was 50 times the diameter in inches, or 2 times the
diameter in mm, which is approximately 180X.  Did I get it wrong
or am I misinterpreting the specs?  I am interested in buying an
ETX and would appreciate your help. Thanks.
LT

Lorne@rand.org

Mike here: The normal maximum magnification is indeed 50-60x per inch of aperture. You can exceed that with high quality optics (like in the ETX) but the image does deteriorate with higher magnifications. Brighter objects will do better at the higher magnifications.


Sent:	Sunday, October 19, 1997 21:57:32
From:	clingo@ix.netcom.com (Clay Lingo)
Thanks for a really great site.  I just got my ETX yesterday. 
It's my first telescope, tonight was my first night of viewing,
and at this point I know next to nothing about using the
equipment so your site's gonna be a big help.  If you have any
time could you give me your opinion on what I might be doing
wrong with respect to the following:
I used a series 3000 6.7 mm eyepiece to observe Jupiter this
evening.  I could see Jupiter fine with the supplied 26 mm
eyepiece, but with the 6.7 mm I couldn't acquire anything at all.
 Any suggestions?  Should I be using the SP 4000 series instead?

Thanks Again,

Clay Lingo
(S.F. Bay Area)

Mike here: I presume you refocused when changing eyepieces. If so, then the next culprit that comes to mind is that Jupiter was slightly outside of the 6.7mm eyepiece's field-of-view. If neither of the above, have you tried it on terrestrial objects?


Sent:	Friday, October 17, 1997 12:17:33
From:	mmcgarve@fvcc.cc.mt.us (Michael McGarvey)
I thought I'd thank you for your page as it really helped me in
deciding to buy an ETX.  I got a running start on getting used to
the scope after reading through the archived feedback sections. 
I guess I'd direct anyone else considering the ETX to do the
same.  It was nice to start off with the benifit of tricks like
the clothspin focuser, film can port cap, etc.
Like others, I am astonished by this scope.  I had access to a
school owned Meade 4" SCT a couple of years ago and it really put
me off the idea of a small cat.  Its resolution, contrast and
even color were poor; the secondary constantly needed collimation
and the mechanics were really cheesy.  I gave up any notion of
buying a scope and even stopped working on a small Dall/Kirkham
scope I was three quarters done with.  Now after years of naked
eye/binocular astronomy I finally have a scope and I'm loving it.
 I had my first telescopic views of Saturn the lasst two nights. 
The Cassini division was clearly evident as were gold cloud belts
and two satellites all in the wash of hazy clouds illuminated by
the very near moon.  It simply defies words.  I'll be running
short on sleep for a while.

I bought the scope used; its in great shape but has what I
believe to be a collimation problem: the diffraction rings are
not evenly illuminated on both sides of the airy disk.  In the
S&T review of the ETX the reviewer mention this abberation and
attributes it to the flip mirror.  The orientation of
illumination shift is different from the direction of mirror flip
and slightly flipping the mirror (enough to cause significant
image shift) dosn't seem to alter the image.  I am communicating
with Bryan Biggers regarding collimating the primary (courtesy
July feedback archives) but wondered if you might have any other
ideas.  I'm going to try to test the image through the camera
port and try rotating the lens cell to see if I can empirically
identify the source of the mis-collimation.

I don't think it seriously degrades the views obtained, it easily
splits the epsilon lyra doubles; they just sit in lopsided
diffraction rings.  It is clearly performing well for planetary
observations but it bugs me just the same.

Thanks for you input and keep up the great work!

Mike McGarvey


Sent:	Tuesday, October 14, 1997 21:03:14
From:	awinger@azstarnet.com (al winger)
re:45 deg prism- my star shop has reviewed the unit and they
conclude that bcoz i do not use my glasses to view,  the 45 deg
prism does not have enough travel for my eyesight.   sounds
logical, so i have to use glasses to use the 45.   i'll probably
stick with the 90 and no glasses as my lenses do not have enough
eye relief.   I'll reserve judgement on the JMI equatorial mount
and tripod as you have had many more experienced responses.
Rgds
Al Winger


Sent:	Tuesday, October 14, 1997 07:52:59
From:	carlos.leal@retail-info.com (Carlos Leal)
A recent low budget find of a Celestron C5 wedge, single mounting
arm with electric drive, and the lightweight field tripod has
turned into an excellent base for the ETX tube.
The common point of contact for mounting purposes turned out to
be the ETX's photo tripod mounting holes on the tube. The C5 uses
a similar arrangement with a mounting block that in addition to
being the point of attachment for the tube to photo tripods also
serves as a the male part of a slide on and lock mechanism that
attaches the C5's tube to the mount. Since the tube was missing I
had to get a C5 mounting block through a dealer.

I removed the ETX from it's drive per the instructions in the
manual, then drilled two holes with countersinks for 1/4 inch hex
bolts into the C5 mounting block so that the block could be
attached to the ETX with the bolts flush to the surface.

The ETX's original drive remains available for highly portable
use but this arrangement proved a dream to use last night on my
first clear night since the modification. The spotting scope was
actually usable. The ETX can do a full 360 degree rotation around
the DEC axis of the single mounting arm so an awkward viewing
angle can be transformed into a useable one by flipping the scope
over to the reciprocal side. The AC drive is strong enough to
carry a piggyback 35mm camera so there are many other aspects
left to explore.

_________________________________________________________________________
Carlos Leal
Retail Info Central                                        (817) 249-4434
9120 Dove Ct.                                           Fax(817) 249-5488
Fort Worth, TX 76126                           http://www.retail-info.com
_________________________________________________________________________


Sent:	Saturday, October 11, 1997 19:02:04
From:	Ralph_Libby@compuserve.com (Ralph Libby)
In addition to the dewcap mentioned, I used styrene pipe
coupling, and it is large enough to mount a Telrad base on it .
The Telrad makes polar aligning a lot simpler. (wish they did
something about that finder) Placing a piece of duct tape over
the N-S switch has prvented inadvertent screwing up! I have been
"outside telescope person" at the Lick Observatory visitors
nights this last summer, and over 300 people (including the
professional astronomers) have commented on the performance of
the ETX.
Great web page
Ralph Libby
San Jose CA


Sent:	Saturday, October 11, 1997 11:22:37
From:	ynnek@bellsouth.net (Kenneth Vessels)
First off let me offer my sincerest thanks for your ETX page. It
was this page that made decide to purchase my ETX back in May.
Do you have any idea where I can get a thumbscrew to lock my
eyepiece in? I lost mine one dark night while observing. Or any
ideas what to use as a replacement?

Ken

Mike here: Glad you have found these pages helpful. As to a setscrew, I don't have any idea for a replacement. But many Meade customers have contacted Meade directly about lost parts and they have sent replacements free.


Sent:	Saturday, October 11, 1997 06:31:50
From:	partygirl@pop.dn.net (Jame Foks)
I've been experimenting with hand held casio photography and my
results have been mixed. I find it difficult to get the object
I'm trying to shoot (the moon) to show up in the casio
viewfinder. The image "floats" across the screen and then
dissapear, the screen goes black... then I get a low light level
reading on the screen. After moving the camera into several
different pos1tions, I finally get a shot, but this method takes
a while and is quite frustrating. Any suggestions?
thanks, jf :)

Mike here: I fully understand your frustration, which is why I attempted to make a mounting adapter. But after much experimentation with hand-held photography I have gotten pretty good at photographing the moon, Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, and Mars. I still get some image blurring when I'm not careful but I just delete those from the camera. Here's my technique: place the left index finger along side of the Casio lens housing and feel the edge of the eyepiece as you hold the lens to the eyepiece. This lets you gauge both horizontal position as well as distance from the eyepiece. By the way, I also roll the rubber light guard on the eyepiece down so that I can get the Casio lens as close as possible. There is a photo on my ETX Astrophotography Gallery - Basics page that sort of shows how I hold the camera.


Sent:	Friday, October 10, 1997 05:51:34
From:	KIESCHEF@COWEN.COM (Kiesche III, Fred)
Greetings All:
Well the second hand ETX that I purchased arrived on Wednesday.
Mr. Postman had left a note on Monday saying that he needed my
signature, but did not redeliver until Wednesday. Of course
Tuesday night was as clear as a bell.

I unpacked the box, and looked things over and read the
instruction book. It seemed pretty clear, but I did have one
question (I'm guessing that if you set the scope to polar align
as shown you can use magnetic north and get "close enough for
government work"?...the problem is that Polaris is more often
than not hiding behind trees!), but it wasn't a pressing question
as I was just going to try a few prominent sights. I also skipped
over the drive section, as it was pretty hazy and I didn't expect
to be out too long.

I installed the eypiece and the legs (the finder had been
installed by the first owner) and brought it outside to the
picnic table. First target was Jupiter. Even with the eypiece
that came with the telescope, I was able to see all four
satellites (three on one side, one on the other) and some
banding. Beautiful! I was able to acquire the target using the
finderscope and then use the slow motion controls to center it in
the scope and keep track as it moved.

Next up was the moon, peaking amont the backyard trees. Again, no
problem getting it in the finderscope and then the eyepiece.
While 48x is not super detail, I was impressed with the clarity
of the picture given and the almost 3D feel of looking at the
craters along the terminator. Good stuff!

Next up was Saturn, fairly near the horizon and pretty much lost
in the haze. The night was clear, but humid, so the haze was
pretty thick. Even so, and even at 48x, I was able to discern
clearly the yellow color of the planet and see the rings clear
enough to tell their angle to the planet. Not good enough to see
gaps, shepherd moons, etc., of course, but as good as I expected.

I left the scope out on the deck (with the large cap and all
small caps on!) and went into the house to make dinner. My wife
came home at 8:30 from work and I brought her outside to show her
the sights. The moon and Jupiter were lost in the backyard trees,
but I was able to show her Saturn. Seeing had settled a bit more,
so the picture was a bit clearer.

After supper I went out again, but things had hazed over. Also,
the scope had totally dewed over. Good thing I had capped
everything! I brought it inside for the evening.

I get up at 4:30 AM to walk the K9's, so after taking them out I
brought the scope outside again. I was able to acquire Saturn
again, much clearer than either of the two previous sightings. I
also took a look at Sirius and the Orion Nebula. Stars seem
fairly pinpoint sharp, and the same general pattern appears when
its positively and negatively out of focus.

The telescope looks to be in good shape, mint condition. There's
a little dust on the correcting lens, but no big deal. The
eyepiece appears to have a smear on it (fingerprint?), anybody
have advice on cleaning that or should I leave it alone?

I'm trying to find time to get over to either Focus Camera or
Adorama, both in NYC (where I work). But it's Crazy Time in the
office, so I may end up mail ordering (seems kind of silly when
I'm so close, but travel time isn't office time!). A Barlow is a
must first purchase, I may get a few other eyepieces as well as
some filters and the like...

Finally I can say:

Clear Skies!

Fred Kiesche
(FKiesche@aol.com)


Sent:	Thursday, October 9, 1997 08:31:30
From:	dbarbee@cyberramp.net (Don Barbee)
Just some comments on observing etc.  All the Messier objects
should be visable in an ETX.  This is not to say you can see them
all from the city of course.  Messier used a 4 inch refractor
finding all the M's. But that was in a time without enhanced
coatings etc.  Our ETX's should easily match or exceed the
refractor he used. I recently purchased a Bogen 3025 tripod. 
Very sturdy. I'm currently fabricating a "wedge".  When complete
I'll send the details in case anyone else wants to try it.  It
should come in at around $20. Dew sheilds:  I have Roger Tutthils
dewsheild.  Its very attractive rolled aluminum tubing lined with
very thick velvety material.  The tube has nice end rings and is
decorated all over with moons and stars etc. It can be slid down
over the ETX tube for storage much like the dew sheild of a
Questar! Check it out guys.  Roger also has a right angle finder
which is supposed to be reviewed in Sky and Telescope.
I had the opportunity to observe from 8500 feet up in the
mountains of central New Mexico this summer.  The sky was so
transparent the stars were steady (no twinkles!!).  The Califonia
Nebula was easy in binoculars.  Scanning with the ETX in
Sagitarius and Scorpius was... there just aren't words. Oh well
this is to long now.  Up with ETX!!  My 10 inch is gathering
dust!

Don Barbee


Sent:	Wednesday, October 8, 1997 12:17:42
From:	Ray_Wartinger@wb.xerox.com (Wartinger,Ray C)
What can you tell me about "Observatory Techniques Magazine"?  I
see in issue #19 a couple of ETX articles on improving the RA and
DEC of the ETX.  Are these worth buying the backissue?
Regarding the declination control, last nite I double-sticky
taped a thin piece of plastic, with a curve filed in the edge, to
the case above and against the top of the decl knob and this
reduced the back and forth play in the decl lead screw
significantly.  The knob is a bit stiffer now so I don't know if
I'm going to keep the mod.

One of my biggest gripes now is the wobbling of the fork mount
relative to the bottom half of the RA drive.  This causes alot of
image shift when you lock and unlock the RA drive. I f I try to
tighten the screw the wobble goes away but the screw loosens
itself when the scope is turned.  Has anyone done anything to fix
this?

- - Ray


Sent:	Wednesday, October 8, 1997 09:20:18
From:	jon@cv.hp.com (Jon Brewster)
This really is a great web site.  I have spent a good deal of
time there. One question.  It's not clear whether the Poconon Mtn
right angle converter is different from or the same product as
the JMI.  Since Pocono Mtn is a reseller these COULD be the same.
Do you know?
Jon B


Sent:	Wednesday, October 8, 1997 09:06:18
From:	Ray_Wartinger@wb.xerox.com (Wartinger,Ray C)
I occasionally read (with some dismay) about someone who buys a
telescope, somehow decides that the optics are no good, returns
the 'scope, gets a replacement, and then declares that this one
has excellent optics.  This is very troubling to me.  It sounds
like a crapshoot -- keep returning them until you get one you
like.  The problem being that you are comparing the new one
against one you looked through some number of weeks ago.  How
does one do an objective (no pun intended) evaluation of a
telescope?  How does one know when what they are seeing is as
good as it gets for this particular 'scope?
I have two 'scopes, a 20 year old Edmund Scientific 6" reflector
and a new Meade ETX.  The reflector is a pretty simple device, if
the mirror is good and the 'scope is collimated, it looks good. 
The ETX on the other hand is a more mysterious beast, at least to
me.  I know that it was adjusted at the factory because I can see
the adjustment screws on the mirror mount and they have that
orange "don't mess with this" paint on them.  But how do I know
if they did a good job on the initial adjustment?  or that the
adjustment didn't shift in transit? or if the primary mirror is
good?  or the corrector lens?  or the secondary?

Why am I concerned about this?  Well I see some things that make
me wonder how good my ETX is.  Like slightly off-center
diffraction rings.  And a hint of chromatic abberation - at least
that's what it looked like.  I was trying to look at Venus last
night and I saw red and blue "shadows" on the top and bottom
fringes of the main image. When I look at Jupiter it looks fine
but I gotta wonder if it should look even better.  But then I
look at the double-double in Lyra and see all four stars nicely
split and think "how bad can it be"?

I guess what I'm asking is are there any simple tests I could
perform to test the quality of my ETX?  Any help would be
appreciated.

- - Ray


Sent:	Friday, October 3, 1997 23:00:25
From:	conrad@uwp.edu (Ed Conrad)
I will be on the island of Antigua on 2/26/98 for the total
eclipse.  I am thinking about purchasing an ETX to use with my
Minolta 600si to try to capture this on film.  From reviewing the
information on your webpage and other sources, this does look
like a workable arrangement.  An alternative would be to purchase
a spotter scope like the Celestron C90.  This has a shorter focal
length, but a wider aperture (f11 vs. f13.8)  You have done a
fair amount of photography with your ETX.  How well do you think
it would work in my circumstances?
Thanks for your thoughts.

Ed Conrad
conrad@uwp.edu

Mike here: Depending upon what type of solar eclipse photography you plan on doing, the ETX (or C90) may or may not work for you. If you want to photograph the far reaches of the corona, then even ETX prime focus may be too small a field of view on 35mm film. If you want close-ups of the Sun's limb, then the ETX could work perfectly.


Sent:	Thursday, October 2, 1997 13:48:44
From:	jmetz01@classic.msn.com (Jeffrey Metzger)
Great page!  I was just recently exposed for the first time to a
view through a telescope. It was a rather small Meade refractor,
with no slow motion stuff. But we found Jupiter and the four
moons!  (Four, right?....) It was an epiphany for me.  So now I
am off on a search for a "beginner" (translated inexpensive)
scope to start with. As usual, I want as much as possible as
cheaply as possible.   The good people at Dover Photo in Dover,
NJ, pointed me toward the ETX.  I am also interested in
photography and might like to try a hand at some images through
the scope. Finally my question:  I know that I'll be able to see
the moon and some planets and stars.  But what else will an ETX
be able to pull in?  For instance, will I be able to see the
horsehead nebula (sp.?) or spiral galaxies?  I just want my
expectations to be set properly as to the limits or lack thereof
of the instrument. If I can't see the nebulae or galaxies with
the ETX, what is needed to do so?
Thanks,
Jeff

Mike here: Planets, Moon, and brighter nebulae, galaxies, and star clusters will be fine with any telescope. But to "see" dimmer stuff like the HorseHead Nebula will require long duration astrophotography. That's true of any telescope. If you want to really deep sky astrophotos you'll need a larger scope with a more accurate drive. For visual purposes, the ETX is great. Drive tracking is OK. But when you hang a camera off it, the drive loses its ability to accurately track.


Sent:	Thursday, October 2, 1997 09:20:07
From:	jaynes@sequent.com (Steven Jaynes (jaynes))
I got the $595 price from our local Nature CO. Store.  They said
if I don't like the performance, exchange or refund.  Can't beat
that.
Steve


Sent:	Wednesday, October 1, 1997 11:20:15
From:	phill@iastate.edu
I've seen your web page several times  lately and I was hoping
you could answer some of my questions. I have just received an
etx astro telescope, and I wanted to know what types of deep
space objects you've been able to see, and with which eyepieces?
I am very interested in my new hobby and I have only started
recently so i hope I dont take up too much of your time. so far,
with the standard eyepiece that came with the telescope, I've
observed capella in the auriga constellation and the stars in the
cassiopiae constellation, but without seeing too much detail. Are
there any particular objects that I should look at first? thank
you for your time.
Phil
phill@iastate.edu

Mike here: Obviously Jupiter, Saturn, and the Moon are great objects in the ETX. M42 in Orion is pretty nice (especially the Trapezium), and just looking around the Milky Way is a nice way to spend an evening. Other objects become more of a challenge; you will need a good astronomy charting program or printed charts from some magazine or book.


Sent:	Wednesday, October 1, 1997 00:05:25
From:	virtual@ix.netcom.com (Mark Stratton)
Hi! I have really enjoyed your Web page on the ETX. It is a great
source of information. I bought my ETX at the Nature Company a
month ago. This is a great scope! The images are cyrstal clear
and I appear to have lucked out as far as the drive is concerned.
No tracking problems at all.
Thought I would give you my feedback on a few accesories I have
purchased...

I picked up the Apogee right angle conversion kit from Pocono
Mountain Optics (based on the feedback I read on your page). It
is definitely a great improvement and the installation was a
snap. I do find however that when using shorter eyepieces (such
as the 9.7) that the finder and eyepiece are WAY too close to
each other. The 26mm has no problems and the barlow works fine
because the eyepiece is then higher than the finder. Any ideas on
alternative mounting schemes for the (improved) finder? If it
could be shifted either forward or back an inch I believe the
problem would be much less severe.

I also picked up the Bogen 3211 tripod with the 3275 mini geared
head from B&H photo (best price I could find). This is a GREAT
tripod! Very steady and the geared head makes polar alignment
much easier. Worth the money if you dont want to haul a table
around (or crawl around on the ground).

I also picked up the JMI Motofocus/Motodec (again from Pocono
Mountain Optics). I found it to be very handy, particularly when
switching eyepieces or when switching in and out the Barlow.
Previously I had tried the clothespin technique but it only works
for fine focus adjustments, not the suprisingly large adjustments
needed for the eyepiece changes. I do have a couple of caviats
though. Only one of the 2 set screws supplied with the unit
actually fit into the motor shaft (weak quality control I guess).
It still seems to work pretty well using just one screw. Also I
found that the unit wasnt always responsive... this might have
been the batteries (which were supplied with the unit). I'll
change them tomorrow night and report back. Also the motofocus
unit can get in the way when setting up the scope for polar
alignment. Still, all in all its a nice addition to the scope. No
focus vibration even at high powers. Installation was a snap by
the way.

I am awaiting my last accessory which should arrive tomorrow: The
NGC max from JMI. I'll be send in a full report once I install it
and check it out.


Feedback Archives

Check the Feedback Archives for previous editions of the Feedback page.


Return to the top of this page.

Go back to my ETX Home Page.


Copyright ©1996-97 Michael L. Weasner / etx@me.com
URL = http://www.weasner.com/etx/archive/feedbackOct97.html